Bibliography.

· 

·                   (Langston, 2008)

Ø  Langston, D.C. (2008). The aristotelian background to scotus's rejection of the neccessary connection of prudence and the moral virtues. Franciscan Studies, 66. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=16&hid=15&sid=354af5a7-3b40-4c6a-bd1b-40b14d13c8d1%40sessionmgr104 

 (Rowell, & Hall, 2007)

Ø  Rowell, G., & Hall, C. (2007). Duns scotus and the polity of god, canon law and ecclesial identity, human rights and hierarchy. International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 7(1), Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&hid=105&sid=08353971-f867-4961-9fa5-9658f53b2c9c%40sessionmgr12  doi: 10.1080/14742250601153781

 (Sullivan, 2010)

Ø  Sullivan, S.M. (2010). Duns scotus on the will: a summary of two distinctions. The Center for Thomistic Studies, Retrieved from http://www.scottmsullivan.com/articles/scotus.pdf

 

·                   (The Subtle Doctor, 2000)

Ø  The philosophy of john duns scotus. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.radicalacademy.com/philscotus.htm

               (Williams, 2010)

Ø  Williams, T. (2010). John Duns Scotus. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved November 9, 2010, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/duns-scotus/